Fascism in the Contemporary World

the political organization led by Csurka, rates as either ultranationalist or fascist groups. Within these contexts, the assessment of the Hungarian political environment is as follows:1. Ultranationalism:a. Both the government and Csurka's group are strongly patriotic.b. Both the government and Csurka's group are strongly chauvinistic.c. Csurka's group is highly insular; the government is less so.d. Csurka's group is highly exclusionary; the government is less so.e. Neither the government nor Csurka's group avoids international interventionist activities, as both groups demand the return of the territories of surrounding nations in which large concentrations of ethnic Hungarians reside. 2. Fascism:a. The government attempts to exercise authoritarian control; Csurka's group advocates such control.b. Neither Antall, Boross, nor Csurka can be described as a charismatic leader.c. The coalition government attempts to stifle opposition; Csurka would use force to stifle political opponents.d. Both the government and Csurka's group are strongly nationalistic.e. Both the government and Csurka's group are strongly anti﷓communist.f. Both the government and the Csurka group are anti﷓liberal.g. The coalition government claims to be democratic in character; however, there is doubt that the Center﷓Right coalition would relinquish power without a fight. Csurka deplores democracy.h. The government shows antipathy toward parliamentary parties, while the Csurka group is openly anti﷓parliamentary party.i. The government has given no indications of what actions it would take to remain in power. Csurka advocates the violent seizure of power.j. Neither the government nor Csurka's group has been linked directly with the use of violence and terror. Both the government and Csurka's group, however, have used propaganda to attain political objectives. k. The coalition government has displayed a willingness to dis...