Data Bases
Custom Term Papers
Free Term Papers
Free Research Papers
Free Essays
Free Book Reports
Plagiarism?
Links
Top 100 Term Paper Sites
Top 25 Essay Sites
Top 50 Essay Sites
Search 97,000 Papers @ DirectEssays.com
Search 101,000 Papers @ ExampleEssays.com
Search 90,000 Papers @ MegaEssays.com
Free Essays
Term Paper Sites
Chuck III's Free Essays
Free College Essays
TermPaperSites.com
My Term Papers
Get Free Essays
Essay World
Planet Papers
Search Lots of Essays
Back to Subjects
-
Political Science
The Future of Miranda
The Future of Miranda Why is the future of Miranda in doubt? The Supreme Court decision of Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 set a federal standard to read all suspects the rights that they hold. These rights include the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, the right for an attorney to be appointed if one cannot afford one, and the right for the attorney to be present during questions. For about 33 years all evidence during questioning has been thrown out in cases where the Miranda rights were not read before questioning. In 1968 Congress passed a law that said federal courts do not have to dismiss confessions made without Miranda warnings, it is known as Section 3501. This law has remained dormant for about 30 years, until the appeals court ruling in the case of a Maryland man, Charles Dickerson, accused in seven bank robberies in Maryland and Virginia. He made incriminating statements to FBI agents before he was read his Miranda rights. University of Utah law professor Paul Cassell, representing conservative Washington Legal Foundation, waited for the opportunity to use Section 3501 until this case. He argued that Section 3501 allowed the courts to use Dickerson’s statements regardless of the Miranda warnings. The appeals court agreed to Cassell’s arguments, and the decision has gone to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has agreed to look at the case, Dickerson vs. U.S., 99-5525, in the new year. Its controversy has been centered around voluntary confessions and if the 5th amendment requires the rights to be read. The Miranda warnings have been suspended in 5 states to this date and the Supreme courts awaited decision will decide the faith of the Miranda warnings. Bibliography:
Word Count: 286
Copyright © 2005
College Term Papers
, INC All Rights Reserved.