d or to blame the government. When they feel alienated the citizens want to run away from the poor country and start a new life where it's possible to be better off. These try to immigrate to first world countries where they could be employed and paid adequately. The second group that develops a mistrust towards the government are more likely to protest it and in more serious cases rebel against the government or the regime. Unlike the alienated this group develops strong national identity and blames the regime or the government to destine the country to poverty. It is true that without the massive amounts of foreign aid supplied by the first world some third world countries would be would not be around for this long and would have absolutely no hope of survival.However these aids are not coming from the heart. The first world countries want the third world to better off and become self-sufficient since they make valuable markets for the future. Concerning the reasoning of the developed's actions taking place in the third world developed conflicts with the Third World view. The developed countries arm and maintain military presence in the third world and declare: "to prevent takeovers by hostile foreigners" as their reason. However third world countries have a different point of view of these actions. They believe the threat is not the hostile foreign countries but their own corrupt governments. The troops are there to prevent uprisings of the nations' own people against oppressive local governments consist of wealthy elites working in collusion with developed world. Third world countries should try to improve their economies and social order as soon as possible before the gap between the third world and the first world becomes impossible to be covered up. Or else they will never break free of this entrapment of the world economic system that benefits the first world and exploits the third. The possible resolution to diminish poverty ...
