There have been a few recent events which have occurred with respect to the UnitedStates policy towards NATO. We can see that very recently the United States has kept prettymuch the same attitude of foreign policy towards NATO that is has ad consistently in the past. First we see that the US has supported NATO militarily with its involvement in the war inKosovo. We can also see that the US has kept the policy of slow enlargement by the recentaddition of the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland to NATO. So from this evidence in therecent events that the US has, still, kept a policy of slow enlargement and military aid towardsNATO.Now that we have the history of US policy towards NATO out of the way I will give youthree policy recommendations I believe are what America should aim for and after I list thosethree and why I will give you the one I think is most feasible and justify why I think that should bethe way to go. The three policy recommendations that I have come up with are; the status quo,that is to say slow enlargement and much military aid, rapid enlargement with a conversion ofNATO into a more economic alliance now that the Cold War is over, and then maybe the USshould consider trying to make NATO an alliance of just the super powers and these superpowersshould try to prevent outbreaks of war and play international policemen.The first recommendation that I suggest is stay with the status quo. We see that the UShas kept a fairly constant policy towards NATO and that policy has been military aid and slowenlargement. One of the biggest advocates for this policy is the President, Mr. Clinton himself,believes that the US should fight for the slow enlargement of NATO to build a new entity thatmight promote world peace. There is also the old saying that if something isnt broke, then donttry to fix it. A lot of people have this view on the way the US should look at NATO, it is in ournature if you think about it. We have always ...
