percop for the world in which the other nations would followand let lead. In this super policing force every member could contribute the same large amount sothat there would be no fighting over who should get to rule and make decisions and there wouldbe no fighting about who should contribute what because they would all contribute the same. Even now, you can see that most of what NATO does is in the interests of the member nationswho contribute the most. The only way possible for NATO to continue with the original missionplan it had would be to cut back on its membership.The last policy I recommend is the one I think we should follow. I think that the USshould try to enlarge NATO as much as possible but change the mission to economic stability. With economic stability there would be very few reasons for war. If everybody came togetherand put together an economic aid type program the only direction this world would go is up. Imsure some can only imagine what a stable world economy would do for everyone involved. Bycreating this, the US would gain many allies. What better way to promote peace but to offer aneconomic council to help third world countries and all of the eastern European states, especially,to recover from the communist struggle that they just recently got out of. The whole reasonNATO was created and the US joined it was to promote peace by preventing war and by shiftingits mission to this I think that this can be achieved in a different kind of way. If this doesnt occurthe US is in danger of losing a great alliance because NATO would be at risk to just disintegratebecause it cant adjust to the fact that the Cold War is over and they dont know what to do now. Why dont we help make something that was just created for a specific idea and turn NATO intoa truly peaceful alliance. This is, sadly, one of the only hopes to keep a dream of world peacealive. As you can see I just gave you a brief history of NATO an...
