d the Jewish vote in America. The bottom line is that the Israelis have a great deal of money throughout the world, and it would not surprise me to know that they have used it to their advantage. Even the U.S. as an ally is beginning to become uncomfortable with recent events in the Middle East; in particular Israel's stand on certain "boundary" issues; it has become evident that in the future as the tension grows and the situation escalates it will become increasingly difficult for the U.S. to stand behind Israel's actions in front of an overwhelmingly disapproving U.N. Media participation has been predictably selective and biased where content is concerned, the story follows the money and vice versa, news sources have also been consistent in this respect, given the variables and intent in bringing about a desired mindset in their perspective environments. Surprisingly this makes it easy to see the story behind the story. The media in newly democratic Poland could very well be in better shape that the rest because of the untested waters, but this very newness is the very potential for disaster. As the prognosis improves and the money floods into the country so then will the sharks, looking for a foothold (the media).Throughout the world the media is telling two stories if you're listening. Some are more urgent than others, such as the recent rumblings of Soviet reformation, or renewed violence in Israel, its all quantum physics, everything is interrelated. The communication age has facilitated the global market and government "one world" discussion, but to what end, this will definitely signify the end of the small conflict. Got Armageddon? Works citedAumonte, Jerome. Gross, Peter. Hiebert, Ray. Eastern European Journalism: Before During and After Communism. Hampton Press, Inc. 1999.Brooke, Steven. "Views of Jerusalem." New York: Rizzoli International Publishing, Inc, 1998.Conolon, Michael. "Gores Dwindling Hopes Rest on Florida High ...
