present circumstances instead of focusing on childhood traumas. This analysis of patient-therapistinteractions can then be generalized to interactions with others outside of therapy. The past may beexplored, but only in the context of the clients present circumstances (Corey, Nugent). I like thisapproach because unlike cognitive-behavioral methods, it allows the client and therapist more roomto explore the role of unconscious factors, feelings, and other underlying causes of difficultiesinstead of just being symptom oriented. I would use Gestalt techniques (such as role-reversal, etc.)in both individual and group sessions when appropriate (Nugent, Corey).Some of the limitations of this approach (Psychodynamic), revolve around ambiguity and theintrapsychic nature of these therapies. Some ethnic minority cultures, such as many AsianAmericans, may not be comfortable with this focus and prefer a more structured approach tocounseling. Corey states that, ....intrapsychic analysis may be in direct conflict with some clientssocial framework and environmental perspective. (Corey, 1996 p.128). Gestalt, and Holistic therapies both have qualities/characteristics that fit well within thecollege counseling arena. Gestalt techniques such as role play/reversal, etc. would be particularlygood for group sessions. And I think that bringing the health of the physical body and spirit into playis an essential aspect to overall health and well-being as emphasized by Holistic practitioners. Iwould choose an integrative/eclectic approach combining particular aspects of all the previouslydiscussed therapy/counseling theories depending on the individual case before me. In review, although brief therapy/counseling is by no means a panacea for all the presentingproblems in the world of mental health, it is in fact a great therapeutic tool for the majority of themore normal developmental life issues or problems that present themselves in the lives of theaverage popu...
