or lustful style of love, and pragma, which from its name tells you it the practical or logical style of love often called the “shopping list” style of love. And the three sexual styles are role enactment, which is when the script sexual partners engage in are comparable to being on stage where they include apparatus such as mirrors, sex toys, lingerie, etc. on the “set” of their sexual encounters. There is also the sexual trance, style of sex, where partners become totally absorbed in the act of attaining pleasurable sex, and also the sexual style of partner engagement, where there is a prerequisite of a loving relationship, and the emphasis of this sexual style is on closeness, full body contact, kissing, etc. including intimate conversation before, during, and/or after sexual intercourse.After a thorough study, Frey and Hojjat concluded that the relationship between the various love styles and sexual styles varied by number of partners and also by gender. For example they found that eros, or passionate love was relative to role enactment in women, but not in men; while storge, or friendship love, was negatively related to role enactment for women, but not for men. And they also found that there was a negative relationship between partner engagement preferences and the number of sexual partners for men, but not for women. And after carefully correlating the coefficients found in the study, Frey and Hojjat revealed that none of the love styles were relative to role enactment or sexual trance. On the other hand, they found that mania, storge, agape, pragma, and eros were positively relative to partner engagement preferences, while ludus had a negative relationship to preferences for partner engagement. From this, they also gathered that mania, storge, and agape were psychological as opposed to that of the ludus, pragma, and eros sexual scripts, but that from and evolutionary perspective, they were all in e...
