eation of false memories are possible. (Kandel, 1994) In this paper both sides of the debate will be analyzed and evaluated. The issue of ‘false’ vs. ‘repressed’ memories is of increasing relevance to counseling psychologists and indeed to any professional involved in therapy. The reputation of therapy is at stake, as clients begin to sue therapists for the implantation of false memories. In turn, it is essential that all clinicians conduct their therapy according to the latest guidelines of practice as to avoid suggestion and the possible implantation of false memories.The need for understanding the phenomenon of repressed memories is also very important from a legal standpoint. In recent years there has been numerous cases of people suing their parents or other authority figures for abuse that has been recalled many years after the abuse was said to have occurred. The rulings in these cases have often been controversial considering there is often not enough concrete or collaborative evidence to prove the accused to be guilty or innocent. The judge and jury are often forced to make a ruling that relies heavily on the testimonial of the accuser. This is very contentious considering there is not an accurate and reliable test to determine the validity of the accuser. The importance of understanding the underlying psychological mechanisms by which both memories are repressed and recovered, and are falsely created has great implications clinically and legally for our society. Hopefully future research will help close the gap between the distance sides of the debate.The general findings associated with the repressed memory debate has lead to strong evidence both in favor of repressed memories and also in favor of recalling false memories. Proponents of genuine recovered memory have cited a wealth of studies documenting that people that have been sexually abused as children have, at some time, forgotten the experien...
