elieving in the traditional gods; though he is less convincing in his claim that he has no allegiance to other gods. Socrates claims he could not possibly be guilty of the first charge for several reasons. He feels the charge arises out of anger towards him for when he applies his “Socratic method” while questioning others’ beliefs, it often has the effect of leaving them feeling embarrassed and ridiculed. However, Socrates maintains that his objective is merely to ascertain the ultimate truths, a noble act for sure. In fact, Socrates believes that the pursuit of truth is the most important work of man. Besides, the youth following is not as a result of recruitment but rather “of their own free will” (23cl-2). And on the actual charge of corrupting the youth, when prodded by him to give an example of these acts, none is forthcoming. They present it in a general sense lacking any specific incidence. Furthermore, it is illogical for one to willingly corrupt one’s companions, for “if I make one of my associates wicked I run the risk of being harmed by him so that I do such a great evil deliberately, as you say?” (25e 3-5). Socrates further argues that if he truly did corrupt the youth, it may explain why his “students” did not accuse him of such, but it wouldn’t account for the absence of inquiry from their distraught families. If those closely involved have not shown any concern, this is further evidence of his innocence (33 d1-34 e3). Perhaps, most telling is that Socrates was willing to sacrifice his life for his convictions instead of pleading for clemency by detracting from his views. This shows the high character of Socrates who holds steadfast to his beliefs under even the most trying of circumstances. The second charge of not believing in the traditional gods seems to be a trumped up charge as well. Socrates tells of his mission to discern the enigmatic statement tha...
