n article generated by the AIDS National Interfaith Network. In it theyproclaim that the enormity of the pandemic itself has compelled us to join forcesdespite our differences of belief. (ANIN 1)Further, we are told that AIDS is an affliction of the whole human family, a condition inwhich we all participate. (ibid) The assertion is then made that God does not punishwith sickness or disease. (ibid) Now, if we agree that the Almighty is infinite and we, asindividuals are finite, how can anyone make such a definitive assertion of the intent andmethod of Deity? This fallacy will be explored later; it is abused by advocates of severalperspectives.The authors lay out their objectives: an emphasis on prevention for those not yetinfected and non-judgmental care, respect, support and assistance for those who are.They are committed to transform public attitudes and policies. (ibid 2) Theseattitudes which are to be transformed are the sins of intolerance and bigotry. We areadmonished to remember that AIDS is not a gay disease. (ibid) The policies[government?] which need such transformation are alluded to in the assertion thateconomic disparity and poverty are major contributing factors in the AIDS pandemicand barriers to prevention and treatment. (ibid)Not included in this advocacy for prevention and education is any assessment inhow the behaviors which transmit the disease may be major contributing factors.Nowhere in this missive is the suggestion that any effective education might need toinclude what those who are infected may have in common and what could be learnedfrom this. We are instead expected to take the leap that intolerance and bigotry and economicdisparity should be the focus of our efforts in the struggle against AIDS. Are we tosuppose that even they actually believe this to be true? Do they really mean to implythat the original outbreak of HIV/AIDS and/or its continuation was caused by peoplewho consider the behaviors which transmi...
