there would be full light as to what God had purposed for that day, it having been accomplished by that time. All these events agree with science as regards the order of events. Begrudgingly scientists have acknowledged that. Yet scientist have tried to duplicate long hypothesized life coming from a primordial soup. What have been the results? They have still not been able to construct life with in a controlled environment. This is a big blow to endorsers of evolution. Reason on this; if the controlled environment of a lab is the universe in which life is held, and life has to be produced by the use of mathematic laws, logic and controlled environments? Who are the scientists in this role of producing life?So all things considered. Is it logical to base ones belief on an illogical non-mathematical probability, or a belief with a creator of such a magnificent universe and the life that occupies earth? Consider this, if you came across a mansion in the middle of a desert well equipped in every way and stocked with food, would you believe it got there by some chance explosion?Well this is the reasoning of evolutionist. I consider myself a wonderful creation, not a mutation from some prehistoric bacteria. I am not a mistake or something in existence because of chaotic chance. I was the product of intelligent design. I believe in common sense, shouldn’t you?By Eddie Thomas - progeny of a higher source...
