ur sin would be if Christ had no sin himself. ?It would only have taken one sin to make Jesus a sinner. ... In that case, he would be unable to save Himself, let alone be the sinless substitute for the sins of the world .?Therefore, if Christ were to fulfill the will of the Father, there would have to be an assurance that He remained sinless throughout his entire life. The only way to guarantee that Christ would remain sinless would be if Christ could not sin. Therefore, Christ had to be impeccable.The eighth argument for the impeccability of Christ is presented by Sahl and is based solely on the Biblical statements of Christ and the fact that the Bible is inerrant, accurate and authoritative. Sahl extracts the following verses: Mark 2:1-12 (the account of the Paralytic at Capernaum), John 7:18 (Whoever speaks on his own is bent on self-glorification. The man who seeks glory for him who sent him is truthful; there is no dishonesty in his heart.), John 8:29 (The One who sent me is with me. He has not deserted me since I always do what pleases him.), and John 14:6 (Jesus told him: ?I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through me) and then concludes Jesus ?is the impeccable Saviour who saves His people from their sins .?In summary therefore we have seen that:i) the fact that Jesus, who is God, is holy means that He his impeccable because for Him to sin would mean that God is capable of change;j) the fact that Jesus, who is God, is omniscient implies that He is impeccable;k) the fact that Jesus, who is God, is omnipotent implies that He is impeccable;l) the fact that Jesus, who is God, is omnipresent implies that He is impeccable;m) the fact that Jesus is a unique person who has an omnipotent desire and is submissive to the divine will implies He is impeccable;n) the fact that Jesus is the offering and sacrifice for man?s sin implies that Jesus is impeccable; ando) the fact that Jesus own statements conc...
