de the dispute of religion and schools extremely difficult and more of a political issue and campaign, instead of an educational issue (Blanshard 2). However, this issue has still not been taken care of at its source. The United States Supreme Court has never made a direct ruling to defend neutrality on religion or to help protect the first right that America obtained 214 years ago. Religious leaders' dreams of sharing the responsibility of financing the private institutions of religious affiliation with the community are delaying the process of expanding and improving the program of society's public school systems (2). This delay, if not taken care of soon, will be the murder of all hope for an end to this conflict.Faithful, Godly Christians view the "elimination" and "demolition" of prayer and Bible readings from public schools as a denial of Devine truth and a threat against their children's lives (Blanshard 2). As a well-known fact, Christians Rogers 11love to force worship and prayer. The secular school systems and the American public must strive harder if they want religion in their curriculum. If schools wish to stand neutral on religion and prayer in their teachings, then that should be their right to stand neutral. Even though the school systems educate the children and adults of this society, private institutions that teach religion as part of their required curriculum exist and teach the curriculum of public schools too. By forcing the schools to adapt to new ways too fast, everything that has been fought for may be lost forever if no caution is taken as the steps are built. Otherwise the foundation will crumble. Liberals, Jews, and Atheists believe the problem of religion and schools is a fight between two systems; one trying to make Christianity known by teaching it, and the other based on knowle...
