ed) religion on children." I don't agreewith that at all, if there has to be a moment of silence then any child canuse that moment however he or she wants, it does not necessarily have to beused fro prayer. Usually "the chi ldren who have been brought up withprayer or some type of religion are usually proven to be better" kids. Ihave friends who go to private schools where praying in class out loud isperfectly O.K. and normal. This praying in the classroom usually wouldhave a pretty good size affect on the rest of a person's life. Althoughwhen praying aloud it could force one type of religion on a student ratherthan having them have more of a choice of what type of religion they wantor if they even want to ha ve a religion. When there would be the religionin the classrooms. "School children not participating in the prayers orthe bible readings (would be) asked or required to leave the room."0 Thishas been another big dispute because the bill of rig hts states that thereshall be "freedom of religion"1 therefore this means that if a person doesnot believe in god or what ever the instance might be then they don't haveto. This means if you want to have any type of religion you may. Thechildr en who are forced to leave the classroom to stand in the hall areforced to make a statement that says "we do not believe in te god of testate (or) we do not believe that prayer should be publicly displayed in apublic schoolhouse."This was all thought to be by mainly every one allwrong, therefore if a child wished not to participate in the pledge oallegiance or what ever it might be they did not have to leave theclassroom, stand silently in the halls, or write a statement in stead theywere allowed to just sit quietly in their seats. Religion in public schools would be good for certain students but thesilent moment is good enough for now. Since religion has been tried inpublic schools and hasn't exactly worked, the groups of children who wisht...
