ch one could also call his line of tolerance. It is like a space within which the morality of abortion has no place. If it is a case of rape or incest, abortion is a moral act, otherwise, it is not a moral act. How can an act be moral sometimes and not other times? The fact is that the entire pro-abortion argument has consistently been based on lies. This is especially when the medical needs of aborting have been used as the basis for aborting a fetus. Supporters consistently use euphemisms such as terminating a pregnancy which is dishonest. They also say that the fetus is only a 'potential' human being as if this fetus might be born as something other than a human being. They argue that the decision concerning abortion should be between the woman and her doctor but they fail to point out that in the greater majority of cases, the woman has never met the doctor who will perform the abortion until the time of the procedure. Even in the very beginning of the legal controversy, the supporters of Roe v Wade argued were misled; they believed legal abortion would result in fewer unwanted children born, there would be fewer children living in poverty, and there would be less child-abuse. None of these predictions has materialized. It only takes reading the daily newspaper to show these arguments were empty wishes or hopes. In reality, the opposite has happened. The numbers of children abused and neglected is increasing exponentially. The number of children living in poverty grows every day. Based on these two facts, the number of unwanted children being born has not been reduced proportionately with the population growth, it has increased. In fact, the issue of abortion has become even more horrible. Today, there is a procedure called partial birth which simply means that the fetus is a human being and there can be no doubt about this. It is clear and plain murder. Technology continues to advance at great speed. There may well soon be a way to...
