Paper Details  
 
   

Has Bibliography
2 Pages
604 Words

 
   
   
    Filter Topics  
 
     
   
 

these two guys

Israelis is the way they dealt with the many refugees. The Israelis took Jews from all over the world and invited them into Israel for a home. The Arabs left their refugee in many horrible camps and didn’t treat them as equals, as David had put it. He said that if the Arabs were taking care of the refugees as well as the Israelis were then the refugees feeling wouldn’t be such a big problem as it is now. Then land being taken over was brought up between the two men. Daud was upset that they had taken land during a war, which would be upsetting, for any Palestinian. David then replied by telling him that if they didn’t take the land and just waited doing nothing, their whole country would be taken over. Both bring up very good points when they discuss this.David and Daud have very interesting points but if I had to side with one country it would be the Israelis for obvious reasons. The Israelis and Palestinians both have different ways of looking at things and seem as if they will never get peace. When they try to settle one discussion another will come up and so on. Making peace is something both countries want but is very hard for them to obtain. Compromising is something they need to have between the two countries of Israelis and Palestinians and without this nothing can be resolved...

< Prev Page 2 of 2 Next >

    More on these two guys...

    Loading...
 
Copyright © 1999 - 2024 CollegeTermPapers.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA