up to do the same things?3) It is a womans right. Her choice, her body.While I believe these are very good stable arguments I also believe I can come up with a few better, more stable arguments in the opposing view,1) Why is it that a baby in the trashcan is more important than a guy murdered in his home? Where do we draw the line on which is more valuable? We cant! Until we are capable of preventing all murders, be it a baby or a 50-year-old man lets focus on the real issues not those that would distract one from them. I could also say that the girl should not have gotten herself in the situation but I am not ignorant to the everyday casual sex that goes on between men and women. If they are responsible enough to have sex they should be responsible enough to use protection and deal with the consequences when and if they occur.2) The argument about babies having babies really cant be prevented by abortions. A mother of the age 17 is not likely to tell her daughter its ok to go out and get pregnant. If anything she will admit that having a child at such a young age was a mistake and that she would not recommend it or condone it. These situations can not and will never be prevented by young girls having abortions. They should deal with the consequences and not try to run away from them or avoid them. They were the ones who made the action in the first place.3) Is it also a womans choice to kill a person she doesnt like? Is it condoned when people like Jack the Ripper, Charles Manson, and Jeffrey Dommer go out and kill people? No it is not condoned. Why then should it be condoned when a woman kills a baby not even capable of defending itself? It shouldnt and as long as there are people like me who are strongly against MURDER then it will never be condoned.Until the day that murder is legal abortion should be illegal. The fetus of 18 weeks has its very own heartbeat and even though it is not capable of living outside the wom...
