d asset me in making a good career choice decision. Did they meet their objective? Lets start from the beginning. My 4 letter Myers Briggs code was ESTP. This means that I am supposed to be an “action-oriented, resourceful, and realistic individuals who prefer to take the most efficient route.” Reading over the portrait of an ESTP I found that it was not as truthful as I had hoped it would be. First, life is not always as exciting around me as the portrait makes it out to be. Next, I don’t see myself as being action oriented as it makes me out to be. I find that any inconsistency that there are between the portrait and myself is due to the fact that I am not clearly and E, S, and/or a T. My scores for these were all very low none reaching above a 7. It is almost clear that I am a Perceiver. I would have to agree with the P because I indeed do enjoy a flexible, spontaneous, way of life better than a planned, decided orderly way. Some of the suggested occupations for my four-letter code are Farmers, Mechanics, Military personnel, Managers, and Administrators. My two most favorite occupations also were among them, which were engineering and teaching. Next, my strong interest code is SAC (Social/ Artistic/ Conventional). My personal style scales for work style got a score at 50, which places me, write in-between working alone and working with people. My personal style score for Learning Environment is 49, which means I lean a little bit towards practical learning, but I do not really prefer either one to the other. I have a 44 for Leadership style, which illustrates how I do not always like to take charge if I do not have to. I got a 66 for my Risk Taking Personal Style, which means I like to take risk, and appreciate original ideas. My top 5 occupations that the Strong interest Inventory recommended where Elementary School Teacher, Actuary, Musician, Special Education Teacher, and Computer Programmer. Teaching did appea...
