in between--including bills to rewrite the Superfund cleanup law, reform product liability, and speed telecommunications deregulation--could become casualties of increasing acrimony as the two parties position for battle in the up-incoming battle of '96. The GOP game is to make Clinton look ineffectual. They have vetoed one bill after another, making his opponents out to be crazies. There was at one time a faint hope that Clinton and the Right can come to terms. But as the election day comes closer, the name calling will become more fierce. The one hope for the President is that there is still going to be pressure on Republicans to share responsibility for the governing of the past few years. The Fiscal policy is a system that was developed to serve the national economic goals. It is the use of certain changes in the level of taxes and expenditures to serve these goals. In other words, the policy allows the government to fluctuate our tax spending in order to agree with the economy. For instance, if the government feels like raising our taxes to account for other expenditures, than they have the power to do so. The republican standpoint on the issue clearly is that our government should not have this power. They should set taxes at a fixed price. This policy, along with Flat tax could mean that the upper-class citizens would pay more taxes than the lower class citizens. Obviously, this doesnt sound fair. Why should the wealthier be punished for having a higher income. No, it isnt fair that the lower class have to supply a tax when they dont have much money to spent, but if we are all going to live in the U.S. and be U.S. citizens than we should all pitch in equally or not pitch in at all. In conclusion, the Fiscal policy, as the GOP views it, is simply a system in which society sees how our money should be spent. If we set fixed taxation standards, it would eliminate many problems in the U.S. In hopes of looking like he is trying to ass...
