sistible. Could globalization be desirable? Perhaps, as most critics argue that it is a re-run of earlier control by one power, with the US being the one overwhelming power and the internet being the instrument of choice. For many nations there is high costs to join world economy and as for local economies, they are torn by the changes of international markets. Globalization is an enemy of democracy, mostly in underdeveloped nations. No matter who the nation elects to power, they will always be helpless under the ruling principle of the international marketplace. The free market is un-stabilizing both economically and socially. a primary negative result of globalization has been to increase disparity of distribution, both on a world scale and within nations. There are rising inequalities throughout countries, among firms and among individuals. The inequalities are even more obtrusive internationally. Globalization is sealing the gap between rich and poor nations and increasing American domination of the worlds economic and cultural markets. There are statistics that show that in 1985 the average income for each person in the richest country was 76 times that of the poorest and in 1997 it was 228 times greater. In Seattle there have been critics that have argued that highly paid workers are being concerned exclusively with themselves to object the attempt of workers in poor nations to better their work conditions. Yet workers in developing nations really dont have that choice as how they work and really have no intentions to challenge their work conditions.Other bad results of globalization is that economic growth has always interfered with the environment. Soon economic growth will make environmental protections possible yet there is a race between protection and growth. Plagues have also accompanied globalization by its speed of travel. Makes bacteria and viruses much more likely to travel from nation to nation. Intro...
