reditofficially for their software, then they could notprofit from it.I believe that Napster is a great source for musicand should not be changed. I thing that the people whohave a problem with it are money grubbing weasels whoalready make millions. I think that Napster is a greatplace to come and get a song and if you like it thengo out and get the whole album instead of making themistake of buying an album and then finding out youonly like one song on it. So I say, screw Metallicaand the five major labels against Napster. There isnothing wrong with the sharing of music online.Theadvantage of the anonymous peer-to-peer model is thatif no corporation,individual or other entity claims ownership, no onecan be sued. And because no filesare stored on the central server, no copyright isbeing infringed there. The disadvantage of this method, would be thatNapster would still be breaking thelaw, and undoubtedly new legislation would bebrought in and measures would be takento stop the service. Furthermore, if Napster couldnot take credit officially for theirsoftware, then they could not profit from it ...
