d RomancesEach book gave a negative criticism of the play; and I agree with them.The first book said that the play seemed experimental and needed work. The second book said that it was derivative and rather limited in range. The final source said that the play was long and confusing which made many people restless and they left.ConclusionThe play Comedy of Errors was by far something to enjoy. The play was so confusing and was not one bit funny. The more the story went on, the more confusing it got. Notes on the play even said that the story was very confusing and did not make very much sense. The plot of the play was a stupid one to begin with. There is not really much to conclude about the play other than it was very confusing. The criticisms about the play were the same as the way I thought the play went.Works CitedHarrison G.B. A Companion to Shakespeare Studies. New York,1972Harold Bloom William Shakespeare Comedies and Romances. New York, 1975Cliff Notes ...
