alyst works with users to determine the initial or basic requirements for the system. The analyst then quickly builds a prototype. When the prototype is completed, the user works with it and tell the analyst what they like and do not like about it. The analyst uses this feedback to improve the prototype and takes the new version back to the users. This iterative process continues until the users are relatively satisfied with what they have seen.3.2 Method Used in Evaluating the ProductIn order to determine the performance of the proposed software product, the following methods were used by the researchers.1.InterviewThe researchers interviewed the Dean of Nursing and Computer Studies that are concerned in making schedules. They give their feedback that molds the prototype into a refined software product.2.Questionnaire50 users were given questionnaires for them to evaluate the proposed software product. Their answers will give the researchers an idea on what parts of the software product needs modification. A logical sample of question will be given to the 50 users in order to come up with accurate description of the characteristics of the software product in terms of the following criteria:a.EfficiencyThe researchers selected 50 users to used the proposed system to test its effectiveness. The software product should be effective and productive.b.AccuracyThe selected 50 users will manipulate the software and they will test its results. The software product must produce accurate results.c.Reliability50 randomly selected users will use the software without supervision. The software product should be credible and dependable.d.User-friendlyThe software product should contain features that will guide the users to move through the system without being lost.3.2.1 Justification of the Method of Evaluating the Software ProductThe researchers questionnaires require a direct answer from the user. Therefore, unnecessary comments are no longer inclu...
