the society.That is why I declare that I do like the article.It foretells a story of women as the head - the leaders, but it seems in this instance, there is no difference between having a man and/or a woman as the dictator. The women in this story are no women but men. Everything we women in the real world fight against, we possess in the story. We have become our enemy.Feminists are NOT against men - not against their sex BUT against the values and beliefs that our society has taught them and us women. In the story the women here were more callous, more stupid, more arrogant. Aren't these what we hate about men? I think I get the idea that the writer wants people to see what women feel when they are restricted, treated as second class citizens but the implication that everything MOST women do in the real world is unfulfilling and worthless is very unacceptable. And on children, she apparently places no value on them - she considered boys as "helpers", girls - a "continuing line" for production (birth). The women here are not real women. A woman knows how to be a mother to both boys and girls. She is justice for them. She is a lifetime teacher for everyone. Here, she was but another human being drowned in power - suffocated by the perfume of supremacy. Let me explain this, I consider men weak when they shout and lose control over themselves. I pity men who act like they know everything and are close-minded to new ideas because it shows how deep their fear is when they feel their perfect world is threatened by ALIEN notions. I did not like article because it was not ideal. We have come a long way. Equality is almost within our reach. I have no desire whatsoever of another form of domination. Even from women.I am a woman - I am mother to all - I believe in equality. ...
