tural; because if that was the case the evolutionist would be just as amazed with the laws of nature. The scientific claim is that the origin of the universe and everything within it just randomly happened. It is suggested that creation science is a "controlled accident", using the hand of the creator as the controller. However, instead of examining the actual evidence, creationists explain the scientific side of the issue by taking small bits and pieces of evidence and quotes from scientists to back up their claims.and has been proven time and time again with examples such as the jaw bones of reptiles migrating over thousands of years into the ear bones of mammals and the human anatomy showing that we were once long ago quadrupeds. Theories are in debate about the processes of evolution. The only thing that is being questioned and has not been proven is the history of species. For example, human evolutionary theories have one through a great history of change because of new evidence. At first it was thought that Neanderthals, a prehistoric human ancestor from Europe, were part of the lineage that led to modern humans. Now it is believed that they are strictly a side group that became extinct. Discovery of new fossils more similar to humans but from the time period of Neanderthals have made scientists question their original beliefs, but they don't question evolution itself. Writer Stephen Barr put the way science is based the best. He said, "Science derives and explains order by order". He also said that God has brought all things including the earth's common ancestors into existence through creation (14) . Theories surrounding the processes of evolution will undoubtedly continue to change with political movements and new evidence, but it will take a lot to disprove evolution whether it is caused by natural forces or by some higher power, it still exists. "Life on earth-however it began-has evolved and will continue to do so, r...
