ered inherently (existing) immoral, for there is no “act” saying that it is moral or immoral.Moral Denial of marriage to homosexual people is an ex. of double standard. (Homosexuals can’t marry, but heterosexuals can?) Sex was around before marriage. The original drive for marriage was secular, not religious, economic, not moral. Old-style of marriage was polygamy. When fathers gave away daughters, at the end of the ceremony we have a man (the important one) and his wife (his new “possession.”) Now days we have gotten rid of traditional wedding lines. Many points of false notions of prohibiting gay marriages because of “tradition” have been brought up. In the 16-century, many gay couples got married in churches. The focus on marriage is counterproductive. People should define morality for gay relationships. The obvious alternate is marriage. Father Charles Curren defines morality for gay marriages as striving for love and permanency. The church is an appropriate place to begin a reform to show society that homosexuality is not immoral because of tradition or religious beliefs. Still Immoral or Moral? Whether a man/woman loves a man/woman is not a moral issue but a personal matter. Is being homosexual immoral? No! Are some gay relationships sinful? Definitely! But so are some heterosexual relationships. While dealing with a homosexual matter, replace heterosexual with homosexual. Will the claim hold up if the issue is considered on a context of heterosexuality? ...
