the consistency of the story, the sincerity withwhich people tell their stories, the power of feelings connected with this, the self-doubt --all the appropriate responses that these people have to their experiences. I know this isnot true science the bare facts arent there. How ever his good science comes into playwhen he studied other cultures and found equivalent instances and recurrences across theworld. I didnt approve of is how he talked about humans living two lives, one being alienand the other human. There was no scientific evidence proving this. Just some guy tellinghis alien experience. Same view also goes for aliens making hybrid. Hybrid are aliens madefrom humans reproductive tools. No real evidence shows hybrid being made or anything.From this cause I find it fabricated and appalling. Its amusing how the believer started out skeptical and the skeptic started out amused inaliens. I think they use this tactic to get you on there side. Yet Carl Sagan has somethingJohn Mack doesnt. This is precision, which is better than good science, its true science.He confronts everything that John Mack has put to good science and tramples over it withtruth. For example John had a pretty credible point in the event he has heard reallyconsistent stories. Carl implies the media is a great factor to put into play whendeciphering peoples stories. If a alien is known to have big eyes, according to the media,then the stories will star aliens with big eyes. What it would take for me to believe in aliensabductions would be some cold hard material to hold on to. Like Carl Sagan said,scraping of the whole ship, and the discovery that it contains isotopic ratios that aren'tpresent on earth, chemical elements form the so-called island of stability, very heavyelements that don't exist on earth. Or material of absolutely bizarre properties of manysorts -- electrical conductivity or ductility or what else would help me believe is to havean alien exper...
