Although it may help couples that can not have a child naturally, I think it would do more harm than good. Those who agree with cloning humans believe that it would give the parents a chance to have a child that is genetically related to them. For some people this is more desirable than raising some one elses child, and this way parents can make sure that their genes are past on for generations. In my opinion, if people would like to have children someday they should seriously consider all the other options before settling on cloning themselves. Besides being extremely expensive, it is also a very risky procedure that could be devastating to the couple if it fails. Overall, the use of cloning in humans should be left to the imagination.Even though I feel human cloning should not be implemented, one of the arguments against cloning is that the clone will not have an individual identity. I think an explanation should be made to why this is not a valid argument for the opposing side. As stated earlier, a clone only differs from other people in the fact that they share the same exact DNA with someone else only they would be much younger. For clarification purposes, the clone would have its own identity because it would grow up to be a completely different person. The clone and the person it was cloned from will not grow up in the same generation, have similar experiences, nor share the same memories. With that knowledge, it is seen that a clone would not be deprived of an identity or rob it from its freedom in anyway. This is a good example of the misconceptions people make about cloning before they look further into the subject to find out the truth.Instead, I feel that it can be very beneficial in furthering medical research. Once researchers gather the technology, they could diagnose or even cure genetic diseases by altering certain genes or even building new organs. This advancement in cloning could change many peoples live...
