ter educations, better health care and are provided with more opportunities. Silver sees that continuing and becoming more pronounced in the future and extending into the genetic realm.Despite all of these positive things that come from cloning, it does have its negative sides,to. For instances, who is going to have this money to pay for something like this? Although no one has set a price for it yet, because they are not exactly sure they can do it, scientist agree that it will cost a great deal of money. Ranging anywhere from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars.Not only is money a big factor, but who is going to perform it. There are only 10laboratories that have the technology in the world able to clone humans according to Cornell University biologist W. Bruce Currie. Even at that, the success rate in cloning a sheep was 1 in 277 and the new way only 2-3 in 100. So time and money can be wasted. Biologist cant assure the world that they will be able to clone a human so we are better off just trying to live a normal healthy life.If scientist are able to make human clones in the future, and make it affordable, they will have no real parents, even though they may resemble the individual who was made. The clone, however, could differ in that individuals personality, character, intelligence, and talents. If you put them in different environment, they wont grow to be the same. This was a big part in U.S. President Clintons decision on whether or not to ban it from the country.When people talk about cloning the best basketball player or the medical societys best surgeon, those are all positive role models. What about somebody like Sadaam Hussien of Iraq getting cloned? Would the world really want a couple of clones like him? The moral view of cloning is whether or not we should try to take over the role of God. When these clones die, where will they go? They have no real souls because God didnt create them. God creat...
