the years of mistrust and suspicion that started since 1959 when Castro came to power and President Dwight Eisenhower enacted its first trade embargo. Ending this sour correlation into a friendlier relationship. In economical terms there many who see Cuba as a potential "Caribbean Taiwan" with easy trade cheap labor and with American investment that can help Cuba grow to a powerful potential. Benefits in political terms could be that with the change that can possibly occur Cuban's will see the benefits of free trade, entrepreneurship, and democratic ideas that will demand a change in Cuba's communist political policies. Besides Fidel Castro grows older as the days go by and he will one day pass away, and with the change happening the future leaders will see that democracy and capitalism are more effective then communism.However these views are perceived very different from the standpoint of American politicians. The American view is that the only way that Cuba will be readmitted to the OAS and the trade embargo from being banished is if Fidel Castro comes down from power and Cuba seizes to remain communist as well as a greater respect and protection of human civil rights. No other country has joined the United States in the trade embargo against Cuba; in fact, the Helms-Burton Act angered nations that do business with Cuba. For example, Canada, Spain, France, and Italy are among Cuba's top trading partners. Many U.S. lawmakers believe that Castro poses such a threat, thereby giving the United States permission to implement trade sanctions against Cuba. Supporters of the embargo argue that isolating Cuba from the global economy is the most effective way to weaken Castro's political support, and bring about his resignation or his overthrow, and if the U.S. invest and helps out Cuba we would only be helping Fidel Castro and his communist regime. And that the readmission of Cuba into the OAS is in conflict with the new OAS emphasis on the n...
