that humans dont eat human in the present day but if humans were in the food chain and we did not have a Martins or a 7UP we would have to kill for our food. Now in times were there where cavemen they had to fight for the food and eat raw meet. If the President Bill Clinton said that we do not have a food supply and we had to hunt and we did not have guns or any type of weapons. What we have to do is work and fight, and then we would be a big part of the food chain and had to hunt every day. Now this is crazy, but we dont have to hunt but I guess we are a Scavenger because we get meat at stores, prey because sharks, and Predators have eaten us because we hunt. Also not lead you in the wrong way but we are in the food chain right know. Many creatures may have similar characteristics. This doesn't mean they evolved from one ancestor. All animals can change to a certain extent, which can explain different breeds of the same species. However, they are limited by their genes and stuff like that. Although genetic mutations rarely occur, they must be taken into account. Most genetic mutations are harmful, but the Theory of Evolution requires that some were beneficial. This can't be true. For example, a fish, which mutates at the beginning of its life, might grow a small part of a lung. Rather than benefiting the fish, the lung would be a useless organ. The fish will succumb to natural selection because it is not as fit as other fish. This is true for any other genetic mutation. This also has to do with evolution and the way an animal can change maybe just be eating something. The Theory of Evolution says the oldest layers of rock should be under younger layers, which makes sense. Parts of the theory are illustrated by the "standard geologic column, but there are a few things wrong with the standard geologic column. Lawrence O. Richards's book It Couldn't Just Happen says there is no place on Earth where the standard geologic column can be seen...
