re tremendously complex. Even the smallest bacteria cell has 100 proteins, DNA, RNA, and containsone-hundred billion atoms. The biggest problem in the development ofcells is either it all works or nothing works. So how do you get everythingto work at once? In order to try and explain the evolution of the cellscientists such as Francis Crick use simpler cells called proto-cells. Aproto-cell is allowed to make mistakes in protein formation in order tocreate new systems. The problem with this theory is that even small errorsare known to cause devastating biological consequences. Now that we have looked at the main problems of the origin of life,we will examine other evidences that discredit the evolutionary theory. First, there are no transitional links and intermediate forms in either thefossil record or the modern world. Therefore, there is no actual evidencethat evolution has occurred either in the past or the present.7 The fossilrecord readily supplies us with representation of almost all species ofanimals and plants but none of the supposed links of plant to animal, fishto amphibian, amphibian to reptile, or reptile to birds and mammals. Next, natural selection is incapable of advancing an organism to ahigher arder.8 Natural selection is said to have caused organisms toevolve from one basic kind into another basic kind. Because all of theinformation for the development of an organism has already beenencoded into the DNA of its parent this would be prohibited genetically. An organism can vary within its kind, but it cannot become anythingmore than what it is. Third, the supposed hominids bone and skullrecords used by evolutionist often consists of finds which are thoroughlyunrevealing and inconsistent. They are neither clear nor conclusive eventhough evolutionists present them as if they were.9 Many discoveries ofsupposed hominids consist of only a mouth fragment, a leg bone, a hipbone, or a knee joint. Evolutionist r...
