isions in both Bower v. Hardwick and Planned Parenthood show a reform in the Court=s application of judicial review. It also demonstrates the complex issue which is abortion, and the right to privacy, in the United States. Since the decision in Griswold, the citizens in the U.S. have bickered over the end result. Both pro-life and pro-choice activist have argued their cases before the media, courts, and to the public. It seems the Court has shifted towards regulated abortions to satisfy the public=s demands. Maybe the choice should be offered to the public, to end the debate through majority rule. However, it is in the Griswold and Eisenstadt cases that a ruling was made, that citizens have a right to choose their own fate to protect their individual privacies.ACertainly the interests of a woman in giving of her physical and emotional self during pregnancy and the interests that will be affected throughout her life by the birth and raising of a child are of far greater degree of significance and personal intimacy than the right to send a child to private school protected in Pierce v. Society of Sisters...or the right to teach a foreign language protected in Meyer v. Nebraska.@ - Abele v. Markle BIBLIOGRAPHYAbele v. Markle. 452 F.2d 1121 (2d Cir. 1971), 351 F. Supp. 224 (D. Conn. 1972)Abortion Laws: A Survey of Current World Legislation. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1971.Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), in Philosophy of Law: Fifth Edition.DeMarco, Donald. Abortion in Perspective: The Rose Palace or the Fiery Dragon?. Hiltz & Hales Publishing Co., Cincinnati: 1974.Dworkin, Ronald. Life=s Dominion: An argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. Vintage Books, New York: 1994.Feinburg, Joel, Hyman Gross. Philosophy of Law: Fifth Edition. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Toronto: 1995. Griswold v. Connecticut. 85 Sct. 1678, 381 U.S. 479, 14 L.Ed. 2d 510. (1965).Lowi, Theodore, Benjamin Ginsburg. American Government: Freedom a...
