Paper Details  
 
   

Has Bibliography
7 Pages
1638 Words

 
   
   
    Filter Topics  
 
     
   
 

Moral Order

e importantly, I understand how another World War could break out in the first place. Hitler was angry inside and was determined to complete the goals that he seemed to have set for himself during the years. Through his new orders and what he demanded, Hitler broke out with fights in many countries during his conquest for a pure Germany Aryan race. This obviously caused hostility in many countries around the world. Through the United States’ allies, we were soon brought into the war deeper than we had originally thought. In addition, Hirohito and Japan bombed Pearl Harbor ten months after F.D.R.’s moral order was announced, which automatically caused a war between the “prepared” United States and the frustrated and angry Japan. So when the question arises whether these comparisons of the orders is a good way to understand composition of the sides of World War II, I answer yes. It is very clear to see the variety of ways that the leaders of all countries were thinking. It is interesting to observe the different ways that the two dictators had such power within their countries that they reigned over. Many might feel that it was wrong of Franklin Roosevelt to propose his moral order after the United States had been isolated from foreign affairs for so long. However it is clear to see that the events that were occurring in other parts of the world at that time were so closely related to the wellbeing of our own country, that it was vital the United States was prepared and willing to fight off any country that was coming to threaten our status as a democracy. World War II was an unfortunate war that seems to be so easily prevented if only there was less ignorance in dictators’ minds and more cooperation and alliances between countries. ...

< Prev Page 5 of 7 Next >

    More on Moral Order...

    Loading...
 
Copyright © 1999 - 2025 CollegeTermPapers.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA