r.”I don’t believe that there could be a world of people who all believed in rational anarchism. Everybody would take responsibility for their actions but then what would happen. If a rational anarchist kills someone, will he be punished? If he is isn’t, that , goes against what they believe in. They will slowly but surely start some form of a government and that is what they were against all the time. If they leave it up to the killer to punish himself, that is not very likely to happen. Not many people are likely to punish themselves if they can avoid it and this would mean that someone else would have to punish him. If you wanted to live in a world where all the people were rational anarchist they would all have to be very well behaved or it might end in the destruction of their world. This would be very hard to achieve because no one is perfect. How are people to learn if something is wrong? Since they are responsible for their own actions it is up to them to punish themselves and if they don’t they will never know the differences between right and wrong, because they will continue to do the wrong that they have been ding and no one will stop them.Over all the idea of rational anarchism isn’t that bad. There are some parts of it in which I don’t fully support and there are other parts that I support. I do not think that is a bad way of thinking and I don’t think it is the best way of thinking. I simply place it in the middle. I would go for this way of thinking with a little o my own changes, but somewhere down the line someone will prove my theory wrong the one that I spent a lot of time trying to prefect. That’s is ok since I know this will happen I wont bother with fixing it when someone else could do it for me....
