find an error in these findings, but only a theory can be prove wrong, and it is directly obvious that these species posses the extremely similar fossil make-ups. One of the most widely accepted theories of how the universe began is the Big Bang Theory. This theory states that a giant explosion created our universe. There are three points that strictly support the theory. 1.As far as we can tell, the universe is still expanding today. 2.The existence of heat radiation that is the suspected "afterglow" of the Big Bang. 3.The abundance of chemicals that correctly account for the hot dense stage that followed the Big Bang. (http://www.newscientist.com/nsplus/insight/big3/bigbang/bb1.html) Creationists on the other hand believe the creation of earth can be found in the Bible in the book of Genesis. In this account, God created the Universe, including the Earth and all the creatures in it, in seven days. Most Creationists believe this means seven twenty-four hour days. By looking at the options, because of course no one was around back then to know what really happened, there is a lot more evidence that points to the evolutionists theory of the big bang. What evidence, besides the bible can the creationists present. They have tried to make a scientific discovery, by trying to prove how old the earth is. But the glitch in their method is they are trying to predict the levels of chemicals that would have been present back in beginning of creation or would have to be present now a days, and this is an impossible method to prove. How could you prove what was in the air, thousands of years ago? They can only predict, as well as evolutionists can, but there is more evidence on the evolutionist’s side. Most importantly, scientific creationists do not have a testable, scientific theory to replace evolution with. Even if evolution turned out to be wrong, it would simply be replaced by another scientific theory. So no matter how hard...
