t, Mr. Grant, on the 4th of January 1934. It was around one a.m. and was bright because of the moonlight when he saw a large object on the right side of the road. As he approached the object he saw a small head attached to a long neck. The animal must have seen Mr. Grant and went back to the Loch.Another event on the 5th of June 1935, which is considered to be of importance, involved a young girl who worked as a maid in a large house close to a monastery. It was around 6:30 a.m. and she was looking out of a window down the Loch. She saw on the shore one of the biggest animals she had seen in her life at an extend of about 200 yards. Her description was similar to those of the others: long neck, small head, skin like an elephant and two very short fore legs or flippers. She watched for about 20 minutes when it entered the water and disappeared. Another eyewitness account happened in October 1955, by Colonel Patrick Grant of Knockie estate. He saw near the bay a great commotion in the water between 100-200 yards from the road. He stopped his car and he could see a black object above the surface 10 or 15 feet long. In less than a minute the object suddenly started swimming eastwards, parallel with the shore and very near the surface submerged. Moving at a great speed it traveled 200-300 yards and disappeared completely.Although there have been hundreds of sightings of Nessie as the above, lots of people tried to take evidence so as the existence of Nessie will truly be a mystery. Many photographs have been taken and from that time more and more people start discussing about that mystery.The first photograph was taken in 1934, a year after the first sighting of Nessie, and it was the one that stood above the rest because it is the only photograph that actually shows Nessie. It shows the thin neck of an animal rising from the surface of the water (see appendix 3). From the moment it was published in the London Daily Mail, it became the very ...
