e auspices of the Framework Convention on Climate Change.I am in complete agreement with the statement, Threats to global life systems such as global warming, ozone depletion, and the loss of forests, are just as important to the future of humankind as the threat of a nuclear catastrophe. I say this because a nuclear accident is nothing in comparison to global warming on a time scale. We have had numerous nuclear accidents such as Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Russia, and countless others both at sea and in the air. In the wake of all those catastrophes, a satisfactory clean-up has resulted. That is the difference between a nuclear accident and global warming, an accident can be fixed, a long term change in a force that was here long before us cannot simply be fixed. Global warming will only cease if all production and pollution is halted and the atmosphere is able to recover naturally. In the age of industry and production, that will never happen. True, our global societies have made efforts to reduce pollution, make production methods more efficient, and attempt to clean up whatever messes are made. Concluding, global societies went tool long without caring for it to have a drastic impact today. Global warming is already on course to have a devastating impact on human life on earth, as we know it. Premature efforts of earths preservation such as recycling and reducing consumption, have proven to be productive but not as impactful as initially hoped. The only way that global warming can be held at bay is everyone on the planet stopped using polluting products, producing waste, and overconsuming earths natural resources. But since that is almost impossible, global warming is something that we as a people are going to have to learn how to deal with because the problem will only garner with time. New and more efficient programs need to be developed as well as alternate methods of energy production because the methods now are ...
