aircraft, Science, College Term Papers.com


		Data Bases
		• Custom Term Papers • Free Term Papers • Free Research Papers • Free Essays • Free Book Reports • Plagiarism?

		Links
		• Top 100 Term Paper Sites • Top 25 Essay Sites • Top 50 Essay Sites • Search 97,000 Papers @ DirectEssays.com • Search 101,000 Papers @ ExampleEssays.com • Search 90,000 Papers @ MegaEssays.com

		Free Essays
		• Term Paper Sites • Chuck III's Free Essays • Free College Essays • TermPaperSites.com • My Term Papers • Get Free Essays • Essay World • Planet Papers

Search Lots of Essays

Back to Subjects - Science

aircraft

aircraft The introduction of aircraft had begun a new era in warfare. No longer were military powers limited to the boundaries of vehicles that were restricted to land. The evolution of aircraft technology helped pioneer a new type of combat strategy that played a significant role in determining the outcome of a battle. Air combat also influenced the economies of the participating countries. The whole cycle of airplanes from the assembly line to the pilot became factors that added up to become an advantage or disadvantage. Aircraft combat became popular during World War II. Each of the combatant powers wanted to gain command of the air, which meant destroying enemy air power while also subjecting the enemy to continuous air attack themselves. However, air combat was not expected to be biggest factor in bringing the war to an end. Command of air was a necessary component in the successful execution of military strategies. But it was these strategies, involving the movement of vehicles and men and the occupying of land that won the day. Air power had a complementary rather than an autonomous role to play. As a result the air war also lacks historical autonomy. Any attempt to impose it on the evidence necessarily exaggerates the significance of aircraft and distorts the view of military strategy during the war itself.” (Fetzer 148). Perhaps the greatest contribution of aircraft in the war was its ability to execute strategic bombings. “The bombing offensive, the one ostensibly independent air operation, was regarded by some of its supporters as capable of winning the war on its own.” (Jablonski 149). Great Britain used aircraft bombing strategies just as they used to use naval blockades. Because of their inferior land army compared to the Axis powers in Europe, a different style of offense was needed, and air combat was it. On the other hand other countries were not as ready to change their strategies. The other fighting powers, despite the popular attraction of the theory of the ”knock-out blow” from air, remained skeptical and never seriously contemplated a strategic bomber campaign designed to do what armies and navies had done hitherto. (Goyer In the end however, neither the British nor the American supporters of bombing could provide convincing evidence that the war in Europe could be ended from air. In the pacific the bombers had a better case since Japan’s economy was weaker and it’s air resistance was much worse. Using aircraft to bomb Japan seemed a wise strategy because the bombings would avoid the needless loss of life that an invasion of the Japanese mainland would produce. Yet the American defeat of Japan was a combined operation in every sense, naval power cleverly combined with air power helped to back up and protect the long haul of the American armies into the Japan’s land. Only when bases sufficiently close to Japan had been taken could the bombings come on its own, and only the use of the atomic bomb, which air commanders could not have counted on when making their original plans, brought the war to an end, with the effectiveness of bombing debate unresolved. It is obvious that air war raises more questions than its place in military strategy. One of the most significant things about air warfare was its close link with a certain level of economic and technical achievement. Only the most advanced industrial powers could afford to run a large air force and undertake the research and development necessary to maintain the technological force associated with such an advanced weapons systems. For this reason the ability to wage a successful war in the air did not depend just on the heroism and determination of pilots or the tactical encouragement of air force leaders, but to a large extent on economic and technical factors. “As the Germans were to discover in Russia and the Japanese in the Pacific, quality could not forever make up for in adequate provision of aircraft from the factories.” (overy 254) Later on quantity became a factor capable of achieving domination in the air. Therefore aircraft production assumed a great importance in the warring economics and became a real test of how successfully modern industrial economies could be converted into war purposes. The Germans and Japanese economies were evidently less successful than those of the Allies. Aircraft production rose to great heights in Germany and Japan in 1944 when it could be used with very much less effect. Had both countries been able to produce what was demanded from an early stage of war, when its provision might have proved influential, then they would have posed a very much greater military threat in 1941 and 1942. Both in Germany and Japan great plans were laid for aircraft output, but problems arose between the plan and fulfillment. “The explanation for lies in the way in that war economies were control, which for political and economic reasons could not be solved until the war was well under way.” (Jablonski 212). Whether these difficulties have been over come or still remain the problem of an overwhelming economic advantage to the Allies. It was at this point that the question of research and development became so important. The superiority gained through quantity depended on the average performance of aircraft on both sides being more or less similar. A real major shift in quality, such as that implied with the jet aircraft or rockets, might in itself have led to a shift in the balance of air power. Hence the powers had to be prepared not only to produce large quantities of aircraft, but at the same time to assure the maintenance of at least an approximate technical parody. The 1935 to 1945 period saw a rapidly accelerating rate of technical change in the aircraft and equipment which placed a great premium on scientific and engineering skills and necessitated to close co- operation of scientific and military establishments. Some powers, like Japan, depended to a large extent on a successful imitation and where hampered by a lack of sufficient of native engineering skill to keep up the competition with other the Allies. Only in America and Britain were there enough attention paid to the fact that air planning had to take full account of change over time. Foreword planning was one of the most important tasks of any air staff and one which had to be fully and carefully integrated into the administrative apparatus in such a way that there would always be better weapons in the pipeline and a strategy to use them. With the exception of German jet fighters which itself suffered in development from Hitler’s intention to use it as a bomber, the Axis powers fell further behind not just in quantity but in quality too. The air war was won and lost not only in skies but also in the factory and research establishments. The influence of aircraft technology was great. Air combat introduced new strategy, which helped to end the war. The air strategy was dependent on not only the commanders, but also other factor, such as, an able economy and enough research. Bibliography:

Word Count: 1507