is based on "phantoms"and "figments"of the human imagination and not on fossils and facts of science (Morris and Parker 142). If they stop criticizing each other and focus their attention on gathering and processing information, they could find the proof that would end this debate. Perhaps faith should be kept in the home and church and true science should be kept in the laboratories. Because it's not likely evolutionists will convince creationists that evolution is a fact, and nothing creationists say will change what evolutionists believe either. In the end people will believe what they choose. Religious believers have a tendency to believe that only their theories can becorrect. Scientists believe their own theories, but will abandon them if a new theory comes along with better evidence to support it. Creationists only have one source to prove their theory correct: the Genesis story. They believe simply through faith in The Bible. If you adopt design it opens a new world of questions and discussions. Scientists, on the other hand, have an abundance of fossil skulls, fauna, and other biological and ecological specimens to prove that evolution exists. Scientists work to prove their theories wrong in order to find the true answers. The creation science argument has constantly said that what they do is use scientific evidence to show that creation happened, but what they are really doing is trying to prove evolution wrong. Evolution, properly understood, can only enrich and add to our faith in a loving, dynamic creator. Evolution does indeed exist, but only because God created it. A major argument states that if evolution is correct, it is purely an accident. All of the facts of evolution, much like the facts of reproduction, are no less astonishing for being na...
