ests using blood samples instead of killing rabbits” (New England 84-85). Due to modern technology, alternative methods are paving their way for more effective and humane approaches to animal research and to solving human health problems. Alternatives like these are already saving human and animal lives. They often provide usable data faster than animal experiments, and of course are much more reliable. Pros and cons to debatable topics are always going to be present. Animal research is a topic that has just started gaining considerable ground in the world. Many people are for it and many are against it. With the technology available now and much more soon to come in the future, animal testing may be minimized. On the other hand, it may be needed for continued analysis of certain diseases and cures. There will never be a right and wrong answer to animal research and testing, just the lingering question that many would like answered, how ethical and beneficial it really is to humans?Works ConsultedClarke, Paul, and Andrew Linzey, eds. Political Theory and Animal Rights. London: Pluto Press, 1990. Call Number: HV4711.P651990.Fung, John J. “Transplanting animal organs into humans is feasible.” USA Today. November 1999: 54-55.Gehlsen, Gale M., Ganion, Larry R. and Robert Helfst. “Fibroblast responses to variationin soft tissue mobilization pressure.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. April 1999: 531-5.Hargrove, Eugene C, ed. The Animal Rights/Environmental Ethics Debate, The Environmental Perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.Call Number: HV4711.A5751992.Morris, Richard Knowles, and Michael W. Fox, eds. On the Fifth Day, Animal Rightsand Human Ethics. Washington D.C.: Acropolis Books LTD, 1978. Call Number: HV4711O5.Regan, Tom, and Peter Singer, eds. Animal Rights and Human Obligations. EnglewoodCliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1976. Call Number: HV4711.A56....
