by another state. As this is used forthat lifestyle, there is no logical reason it should be denied to perhapsmillions of homosexuals that want the opportunity to get married. The obstaclesbeing out in front of homosexual couples is in the name of the "normal" peoplethat actively seek to define their definition to all. It is these "normal"people that are the definition of surplus repression and social domination. Yetas they cling to the Constitution for their freedoms they deny those samefreedoms to not "normal" people because they would lose their social dominationand could be changed. Therefore it would seem they are afraid to change, andhave not accepted that the world does change.Unfortunately the full faith and credit clause has rarely been used asanything more then an excuse to get a quick divorce. A man wants a divorce yethis wife does not or will not void their marriage. He then goes to Reno, Nevada,buys a house and gets a job for six weeks. After that six weeks when he candeclare himself a legal resident he applies for a singular marriage void andbecause Nevada law allows one side to void their marriage is they are a residentof Nevada their marriage is now void. The man now moves back to his home state,and upon doing so this state must now recognize the legitimacy that Nevada hasvoided out the marriage. Even if the wife does not consent, the new state cannotdo anything about it. That is what usually full faith and credit is used under. Legislation enacted by President Clinton from Senator Don Nickles ofOklahoma called the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) has allowed individual statesto react differently to any intrusion of marriage that they feel is not proper.DOMA states "marriage means only a legal union between one man and one woman ashusband and wife." "Supporters of DOMA also claim clear constitutional warrant,and that Congress is exercising its own authority under Article IV to prescribethe manner in which the publ...
