rcinogen. Furthermore, the researches did not mention that passive smokers were less inclined to lung cancer. The invalidity inaccuracy or exaggeration of the results might be justified by the fact that most sponsors of researches or surveys are anti-smoking organizations or the fact that science might be compromised by popular sentiment. In conclusion, most people claim that the product and process of tobacco is unethical. However is it not equally unethical to stop the production and marketing of tobacco , when it offers employment to millions of workers, make much of television and radio free ( without tobacco firms’ funds the standard of many events would fall) and gives revenue to the government( the high prices of cigarette are caused by heavy taxes)? Furthermore, if tobacco firms are considered unethical after all, is it not the government and the media equally unethical? Finally, is it relevant to talk about ethics in marketing?...
