ut the anti-pornographymovement. First, I believe that the anti-porn movement would define the good society asone where there are equal rights for women in all situations. More importantly, I believethat the movement would state that safety and dignity for all people would be a verycement norm in the good society. The current existing societies, after all, are neither safenor fair for women. The new set of beliefs and practices would be much morecomplicated. The anti-porn movement is a feminist movement and would thus containmany of these beliefs. The difference would be that laws would exist that wouldmaintain the dignity of all people through better portrayal of women and homosexuals ina variety of media. The result would be less sex crimes and rape within the good society. The way that we can change our society to make it correspond to our vision of the goodsociety is to limit the production and consumption of pornography which furthers theabuses that the movement is against.The ideological critique of the state is not yet clear cut. This issue blurs thetraditional way in which we like to divide our politics; the right against the left. However, the economic sphere would be impacted by the passage of anti-pornlegislation. There would be protest because, after all, this is a business to many. Therewould be no hunger or famine associated with the passage of such legislation so it isarguable that, in the grand scheme of things, there would be little impact. Politically,things are vastly different. I stated before that there are altering ideas that are bothholding back and advancing the movement. While some of the movement is hesitantabout aligning themselves with the conservative right, some of the movement adores theidea. They like the idea because of the conservative rights ability and numbers. I feelthat if they split the left on this issue then the legislation would pass easily. Culturally,the anti-pornography moveme...
