Data Bases • Custom Term Papers • Free Term Papers • Free Research Papers • Free Essays • Free Book Reports • Plagiarism? Links • Top 100 Term Paper Sites • Top 25 Essay Sites • Top 50 Essay Sites • Search 97,000 Papers @ DirectEssays.com • Search 101,000 Papers @ ExampleEssays.com • Search 90,000 Papers @ MegaEssays.com Free Essays • Term Paper Sites • Chuck III's Free Essays • Free College Essays • TermPaperSites.com • My Term Papers • Get Free Essays • Essay World • Planet Papers	Search Lots of Essays Back to Subjects - Social Issues Who Do We Think We Are againsth the death penalty Who Do We Think We Are againsth the death penalty Capital Punishment is the penalty of death for a crime. The most common criminals who are executed are convicted murderers. What message is that sending? The use of capital punishment sends the message that murder is okay, as long as it is applied to the right person. The application of capital punishment in our society is hypocritical. It has no The way we handle the punishment of capital crimes is pathetic! There are other ways to punish criminals outside of taking their lives, but we, for some reason, feel the need to play the exterminator. The people who commit capital crimes are not animals to be exterminated. They are human. They deserve the same breath that everyone else takes. If a person commits a heinous crime then that person is obviously not normal. That person is obviously in need of mental help and, we should help these criminals instead of hurting Criminals have families and friends who care about them. Why should the innocent bystanders be punished because of another's actions? Killing anyone, for any reason, only brings on more pain and suffering than is necessary. We should recognize the problems in our society and heal those problems instead of placing a temporary fix on a permanent Capital punishment is excessive and unnecessary. Killing a criminal only solves one problem and causes many more. The one problem it solves is the criminal is no longer walking the streets. Encarceration would serve the same purpose. If the criminal is encarcerated then he/she no longer poses a direct threat to society, so killing him/her would be overkill (pardon the pun). It causes other problems because the criminal was executed merely out of retribution. Sort of an eye for an eye. Actions like this only keep hatred and condemnation flowing in society (progress.org). A punishment can only be called a deterrent if it is performed consistantly and promptly. There are three reasons why capital punishment cannot be performed with any 1) The number of convicted murderers sentenced to death are small, and of that number, an even smaller number are actually executed 2)Manditory death sentences are unconstitutional (Woodson v. North Carolina, 1976). 3)A considerable time between the imposition of the death sentence and the actual If a person is going to premeditate a capital crime, he/she is not going to be concerned with the punishment he/she will recieve. Instead, they are actually concentrating on how they will commit the crime. Even after that they are not thinking of the consequences, they now are thinking of how they will evade detection and capture by the police. The severest of punishments will not deter these criminals. If a capital crime is commited in the heat of the moment, when most capital crimes actually are, the criminal is not thinking correctly, he/she can not actually contemplate what will happen as a result of commiting the crime. Every human being on this planet has a breaking point, and everyone is capable of murder. When someone reaches that point there is no punishment capable of deterring them. Some capital crimes are commited as a result of being under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The criminals who commit these capital crimes are obviously not in a right frame of mind and should not be executed. This is not to say they shouldn't be held accountable for their actions, this is merely saying they do not deserve to lose their own life. They may not even be conscious of the action they are committing, so how could they There are also other, underlying, situations when capital crimes are commited. Mentally ill individuals who have little or no regard for the consequence of their Brain-damaged individuals who experience periods of uncontrollable rage and Political terrorists who are acting for either a religion or a leader of a group that Professional hit-men who are ONLY focused on evading capture Other than professional hit-men, few of the people mentioned are actually in a rational state of mind when they commit their crimes. Death as a deterrent is an unrealistic idea for these individuals because either they cannot conceive what they are doing is wrong, or they are not thinking of the consequences of thier actions Capital punishment in California, as in every other state, is more expensive than a life imprisonment sentence without the opportunity of parole. These costs are not the result of frivolous appeals but rather the result of Constitutionally mandated safeguards Juries must be given clear guidelines on sentencing, which result in explicit provisions for what constitutes aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Defendants must have a dual trial--one to establish guilt or innocence and if guilty a second trial to determine whether or not they would get the death penalty. Defendants sentenced to death are granted oversight protection in an automatic These constitutional safeguards translate into: a more extensive jury selection procedure a four fold increase in the number of motions filed more investigators and expert testimony more lawyers specializing in deathpenalty litigation and automatic, mandatory appeals Since there are few defendants who will plead guilty to a capital charge, virtually every death penalty trial becomes a jury trial with all of the above necessary requirements David Erickson's study of Los Angeles County breaks down the cost of a capital trial and compares it with the costs of a murder trial where the death penalty is not sought. The following schedule is a summary of Erickson's cost study of a death penalty trial in If the cost of incarceration on death row and the cost for the mandated appeal to the State Supreme Court were added to the above capital trial expenses, the cost would increase to an estimated 2.5 to 3 million dollars per execution. If the cost of incarceration of an inmate sentenced to life imprisonment without parole were added to the above non- capital trial expenses, which is less expensive than confinement of an individual on death row, the cost of life in prison without parole would increase to an estimated 1 to 1.5 Prisoners are executed in the United States by any one of five methods; in a few jurisdictions the prisoner is allowed to choose which one he or she prefers. These are the methods of capital punishment in use in mid-1997. The traditional mode of execution, hanging, is an option still available in Delaware, New Hampshire and Washington. Death on the gallows is easily bungled: If the drop is too short, there will be a slow and agonizing death by strangulation. If the drop is too long, the head will be torn off. Two states, Idaho and Utah, still authorize the firing squad. The prisoner is strapped into a chair and hooded. A target is pinned to the chest. Five marksmen, one with Throughout the twentieth century, electrocution, has been the most widely used form of execution in this country, and is still utilized in eleven states. The condemned prisoner is led – or dragged – into the death chamber, strapped into the chair, and electrodes are fastened to head and legs. When the switch is thrown the body strains, jolting as the voltage is raised and lowered. Often smoke rises from the head. There is the awful odor of burning flesh. No one knows how long electrocuted individuals retain In 1983, the electrocution of John Evans in Alabama was described by an "At 8:30 p.m. the first jolt of 1900 volts of electricity passed through Mr. Evans' body. It lasted thirty seconds. Sparks and flames erupted … from the electrode tied to Mr. Evans' left leg. His body slammed against the straps holding him in the electric chair and his fist clenched permanently. The electrode apparently burst from the strap holding it in place. A large puff of grayish smoke and sparks poured out from under the hood that covered Mr. Evans' face. An overpowering stench of burnt flesh and clothing began pervading the witness room. Two doctors examined Mr. Evans and declared that he was "The electrode on the left leg was re-fastened. …Mr. Evans was administered a second thirty second jolt of electricity. The stench of burning flesh was nauseating. More smoke emanated from his leg and head. Again, the doctors examined Mr. Evans. [They] reported that his heart was still beating, and that he was still alive. At that time, I asked the prison commissioner, who was communicating on an open telephone line to Governor George Wallace, to grant clemency on the grounds that Mr. Evans was being subjected to cruel and unusual punishment. The request …was denied. "At 8:40 p.m., a third charge of electricity, thirty seconds in duration, was passed through Mr. Evans' body. At 8:44, the doctors pronounced him dead. The execution of John Evans took fourteen minutes." Afterwards, officials were embarrassed by what one observer called the "barbaric ritual." The prison spokesman remarked, "This was supposed to be a very clean manner of administering death." (www.aclu.org) Since it has been argued in the previous pages, capital punisment is morally wrong, then to deliberately kill someone, who has already been detained and no longer poses a direct threat to society, is murder. Bibliography: 9 Works Cited http://www.religioustolerance.org/execute.htm http://www.progress.org/archive/fold56.htm http://www.aclu.org/library/case_against_death.html#retribution Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 http://www.deathpenalty.org/newsninfo/cost.html Word Count: 1606
Copyright © 2005 College Term Papers, INC All Rights Reserved.