t that Microsoft stop these exclusionary contracts.ConclusionMicrosoft is participating in monopolistic practices because they won’t let companies delete Internet Explorer from Windows 95, and they have locked in manufacturers. This is a violation of Section Two of the Sherman Act which prohibits a firm from engaging in exclusionary or predatory acts. They have also violated the Act because they offer Internet Explorer for free, which is “below appropriate costs.” Finally, Microsoft uses its exclusive contracts with ISPs and computer manufacturers to stifle competition. These are all violations of Section Two of the Sherman Act.If the court comes to the conclusion that Microsoft has violated Section Two of the Sherman Act they will have three possible solutions. The three possible solutions are: split Microsoft off from their network company; offer both Microsoft Internet Explorer and Netscape on Windows; have a consent decree be issued to require Microsoft to stop making exclusionary contracts with computer makers and Internet Service Providers. ...
