ugh in vitro fertilization and surrogacy arrangements” (Rifkin, 547). In this upcoming century of scientific advances, a parent’s failure to correct any genetic defects in utero might just be considered a heinous crime. This seems completely outrageous, however mothers have already been held liable for giving birth to crack cocaine addicted babies and babies with fetal alcohol syndrome. Yet no crime is committed if that same mother aborts the fetus. Our society believes that a parent has a responsibility to provide a safe and stable surroundings for their unborn child. Will this belief be carried over to include genetic altering of a fetus? “Proponents of human genetic engineering argue that it would be cruel and irresponsible not to use this powerful new technology to eliminate serious ‘genetic disorders’ ” (Rifkin, 548). There are always questions asked when science advances. Is there a limit to how far one goes? Should we continue to advance and let science determine our fate? Is it fair for a doctor or scientist to tell a person at age ten that they will develop colon cancer at age thirty based on their family genes? Should society allow this area of medicine to continue or stop it now? Genetic research has come a long way, and yesterdays advances criticized by many in the past are now heralded for their contribution to the cure of cancers and many diseases. Caution is necessary in some instances, but let us not be quick to shoot down modern medical advances before we see what benefits can be attained that will benefit the human race....
