was that thestage was not bunched into one side or the other. The combinations of colors also was nicelyhighlighted as shown in the outdoor scene where the grass was a pleasant deep green and thebrick wall was a deep, smooth red. My personal opinion of this production and the theaterwould be that it was of course low budgeted but yet the actors and actresses gave a goodperformance with what they had to work with money wise.The other play that I viewed was The Phantom of The Opera by Andrew Lloyd Webber. This play was showing at the Krannert Center and was a very highly budgeted and detailed play. The actors and actresses that portrayed the characters of this play were well picked andpossessed powerful voices able of keeping you at the edge of your seat the whole play. From theear piercing screams to the beautiful singing that flowed throughout the play. The stageconsisted of four different sections which would rotate as the time changed. The First sectionthat could be seen was the opera house at which the phantom calls his home. The second sectionwas rooftop of the opera house. The third section that could be seen was the catacombs and lairof the phantom. The last section that rotated around was the masquerade ball at the end of theplay. The scenery was very elaborate and well put together. From the antique drapery to thedetailed box seats to the huge organ which blew smoke out as the phantom played his demonictunes. Even the river he pushed his way down in his boat was filled with real water. The props such as the piano and the famous chandelier hanging over the audience werelarge scaled and precision hand-crafted. The directing for this play was obviously higher inquality than in My Fair Lady but of course their was more money involved, so their was moreMotivation as an actor would say. My personal opinion of this play is that it was the mostinteresting thing that I have been to for a while. My life has not been fill...
