re insight to a student's versatility. To base one student's potential solely based on one standardized test is both wrong and lazy. Colleges should be willing to examine applicants closely. They need to understand that if a high school senior has a 4.0 GPA and happened to get a 1050 on their SAT, they're not necessarily incapable of learning. Looking at both class rank and GPA provides a more balanced picture, hence it would increase the diversity of students entering college.Doing away with SAT scores could increase opportunities for those students who do not score well on formal tests to get into colleges, that they would not have normally. The University of California regents are in the process of trying to decide whether or not to drop the SAT as an admission requirement. Atkinson, whose field of expertise is testing and cognitive science, is putting his support behind the idea of doing away with the test as a gauge of whether or not students should be able to get into one of California's state colleges.Atkinson feels the universities should adopt a more "holistic" way of judging incoming students. The idea comes from the long-standing belief that the SAT is unfair to minority students. Right now, about 90 percent of the nation's colleges use the SAT as a means to make admissions decisions, and there has been a consistent gap between the scores of white and Asian students and those of Blacks and Latinos.Atkinson may be correct on one side. I agree with him that A student could be the brightest in his or her class and not be able to perform up to standard on the day they're to take the test. Would it be fair, then, to exclude them from admission to a prestigious university or from scholarships because they were having a bad day? However, completely removal of standardized testing is like dropping grades.Using SAT as example once more. Instead of getting rid of the SAT entirely, the test itself should be reformed. Instead of trying ...